In Today's Catholic World News Blog
June 29th, Feast of Sts. Peter & Paul
"These times of not being able to receive Catholic Sacraments have been prophesied for centuries. This will pass. However there are many whose emotions rule them as opposed to their reason, and they can't persevere.
People need to change their thinking from:
Where can I go to Mass?
How can I help the True Church/Pope in exile?
If they adopted the later, this terrible Crisis [the Apostasy] would end
sooner ... they would quite likely stand a better chance to receive True Catholic Sacraments much more frequently also."
"We have to Realize no One Around Us is Going to a True Mass", 03/20/2015)
"Violent hands will be laid on the Supreme Head of the Catholic Church. ... Yes,
yes, the flock will become small." (End Times Prophecy of Bp. Wittman d. 1833)
The Suffering Holy Father Predicted by Our Lady of Fatima:
XVII (Elected Oct 26, 1958 - Died in Exile May 2, 1989)
Click: Film clip of Gregory XVII which got past Jewish/N.O. media censors
1967 Italian film footage of suffering pontiff Gregory XVII, ("Siri") making a MANDATORY (by his captor's will) public appearance. NOTE: The holy Catholic mystic Marie-Julie Jahenny, who related of the Hostage Pope's hidden papacy, had
it revealed to her the means by which the Enemy would achieve its stealthy incarceration (sede impediti) of Christ's Vicar: "Arms recently invented will be taken up;
day and night they will encamp around his prison." (March 13, 1878) And on August 10, 1880: "If the prisoner martyr (Pope) directs a call (for help), it will be forbidden, under pain of torture and death,
for any kingdom to rush in response to his call."
Abp. Pintonello (d. 2001) took part in the clandestine meetings with the Hostage Pope,
Holiness Gregory XVII, at the Istituto Ravasco convent in Rome, Italy in June, 1988.
His Excellency, Archbishop Arrigo Pintonello (who was brought in by Fr.
Tran to assist the Hostage pope in June 1988), discussing Gregory XVII, in a 1996 interview, said he "was the greatest intellectual genius I've ever met." And in a recorded gasp like Jeremiah, lamented how Christ
could permit the Cardinals to do this to him! (i.e., the violent coup at the 1958 Conclave).
(Source: Videotaped Interview
by Mel Gibson & Staff, of *Abp. Pintonello Italy, 1996)
(who refused to sign any of the Vatican II Documents) was an Archbishop from the ranks of the Military Chaplains. He was designated Military Ordinary (Chief of Military Chaplains) in 1953. During his active clerical life he was commissioned in 1941 Chaplain
Chief Inspector of 360 Chaplains of the CSIR and of the ARMIR, the Italian Army on the Russian Front. To him is due the organization and construction of 380 cemeteries for the war dead, from Botosani in Bessarabia to the Bend of the Don. Decorated with two
Military Crosses, he also earned a solemn Commendation for the work of Christian piety in which he was involved in those dramatic and painful times. He was a Rector of two Pontifical Regional Seminaries, Viterbo and Salerno,
for the training of young future priests.
Cardinal Manning's Imperative Book on End Times (Pope in Exile)
1958 Criminal Usurpation of the Papal Throne from *Gregory
*"The person thus elected [pope] acquires full jurisdiction over the universal
Church immediately on consenting, and becomes the Vicar of Christ on earth."
("Canonical Elections" p. 107, 1917, Imp.)
Jurisdiction Protects Against
Usurpers and Incompetents
"And how shall they preach unless they be sent?" (Romans x, 15)
Declassified Secret U.S. State Dept Document (Papal Security)
St. Nicolas of Fluh on Triumph of Our
Exiled Holy Father
"It is granted to few to recognize the true Church amid the darkness of
so many schisms and heresies, and to fewer still so to love the truth which they have seen as to fly to its embrace."
Robert Bellarmine, Church Doctor)
Blessed be St. Peter, Prince of the Apostles!
The Papal Restoration Staff
Call TCW Toll-Free
(Phone calls taken in English, Spanish, French, and Italian)
Note: A member of the Hierarchy related to two current members of the Papal Restoration Campaign Staff, that Our Holy
Father, Pope Gregory XVIII, views so called, Thuc "consecrations" as at best doubtful. Which to keep it simple, in the mind of the Church means, they
never occurred. Bp. Thuc with his wildcat attempted "consecrations" was acting on his own mandate (powered by the devil). This is without dispute, as at one point he begged forgiveness from Antipope Paul VI for attempting
to consecrate a group (of Alumbrados [Illuminists]) in Palmar de Troya, Spain - bishops, without a papal mandate.
Unholy Birthplace of the Novel/Sedevacantist Sect?
Looking down the street today [rue Garibaldi], that Bp.
Thuc's run down apartment #22 was located on in
Toulon, France. Much of Thuc's scandalous/sacrilegious acts were motivated
by a desperate need of money.
Facts Casting Grave Doubt About the Validity of the Thuc "Consecrations":
- He attended the false Vatican Council II and signed its decrees;
- He publicly chastised the whole Council for not being ecumenical
- He tried to get the Council to accept female equality in the church;
- With the possible
exception of the Sacrament of the Eucharist, he never stated that the Sacraments of the Vatican II church were invalid, rather only that they were rejected by God;
- He consistently
signed his documents with titles given him by the Vatican II church;
- He referred to John XXIII as a saintly pope;
- He acknowledged Paul VI as Holy Father;
- He "ordained"/"consecrated" great numbers of men as priests and bishops without requiring them to renounce their false
- He "ordained"/"consecrated" men wholly unfit to be ministers, this included a notorious homosexual who was at the time in full communion with the Vatican II church;
- He regularly served as an acolyte at the new mass when in France;
- He concelebrated the new mass with a Vatican
II bishop on at least several occasions;
- He heard confessions of Vatican II sectarians with the permission of the Vatican II bishop;
- Before his death, he exhorted some of his progeny to return to the Vatican II church;
- He complained that certain oriental eating customs were excluded from
- He was said to have been physically and psychologically worn out;
- His mental
soundness had been publicly questioned by his contemporaries;
- Monetary gain has been acknowledged by his friends as being a motivating factor in his conferring of Holy Orders;
- He admitted lying to a Vatican II priest in his autobiography;
- His own friend said that he would often speak
- He only acted like a traditionalist when around other traditionalists;
- He admitted
to simulating “mass”;
- He admitted that he withheld his sacramental intention when
conferring Sacred Orders.
Note: On 10 different occasions, i.e., 10 FAKE ceremonies!
Photograph of Bishop Thuc
Publicly Simulating the Sacrament of Holy Orders
on an Alumbrados
Heretic/Insurance Salesman, Mr. Gomez, in Spain on Jan 1, 1976
Pictured above is one example of a self-admitted by Bishop Thuc himself, 100% FAKE episcopal consecration he
"performed". (Bishop Thuc would later formally state he was withholding his sacramental intention (a sacrilege) when "consecrating" Gomez (without a papal mandate: another sacrilege), even though Bishop Thuc
had written and signed an official *document declaring that he did consecrate Clemente Dominguez y Gomez on January 1, 1976.) ???
*"I Peter Martin Ngo-Dinh Thuc, titular Archbishop of Bulla Regia certify
that, on the first day of January 1976, I conferred the tonsure and minor orders, as well as the major orders (namely subdiaconate, diaconate and priesthood) on the following persons:
Clemente Dominguez y Gomez, born in Seville, National Identity Number 28279369 [...]
I further certify that these Bishops and Priests pertain to the Order of the Carmelites of the Holy Face, founded in Seville on 23rd December 1975.
The Mother House of this Order is at No. 20, Call Redes in Seville. The Founder and Father General is His Excellency Clemente Dominguez
y Gomez, Bishop.
With my own hand and pen
I sign this document in order to procure all effects ecclesiastical and civil.
Given with my seal,
day of January in the year of Our Lord one thousand nine hundred and seventy six
Signed + Peter Martin Ngi-dinh Thuc
Archbishop of Bulla Regia.
The Church’s minimum requirement for accepting the validity of a Sacrament is “moral certainty.” Moral certainty is one“which excludes all prudent fear of
error, such that the opposite is reputed as altogether improbable.”
Now in weighing all of the above evidence, the question becomes:
Does the certainty of Bishop Thuc’s consecrations reach such a level as to exclude all prudent fear of error?
Is the possibility that he did not validly
consecrate, altogether improbable?
It seems to me that no objective person possessing the use of right reason could conclude that Bishop Thuc’s consecrations were certain
to the degree that they excluded all prudent fear of error, such that the opposite is reputed as altogether improbable.
Catholics, therefore, must reject the validity of Bishop Thuc’s
consecrations. And if we must reject Bishop Thuc’s consecrations, we of course must also reject all of the ordinations and consecrations emanating from the Thuc progeny, for the Thuc "bishops" cannot supply for what was originally wanting to the Sacrament
of Orders – one cannot give to others that which they do not possess themselves. So the lack of moral certitude by which Catholics must reject the validity of Bishop Thuc’s "Orders" he "conveyed", must also be applied to Bishop
"Probability of Validity" does NOT Suffice for the Administration of the Sacraments
Sanborn & Sinéad: With Thucite Sect All Bets ARE OFF
know the sacred priesthood only comes from God's calling a chosen soul and then The Church of St. Peter confirming that mandate from Heaven. ... And these pathetic sedevacantists try to publicly deride Catholics [the Church in eclipse] for not attending
their sacrilegious services?!?)
Phony Trads Bury Heads in Sand in Face of Catholic Truth
"It is a grave responsibility of all Catholics to prove to themselves that the sacraments where they are attending are licit [lawful] in the eyes of Christ's Church, for if Catholics ever approach the sacraments without knowing for certain that the ministers have [BOTH] valid holy orders and have been given *canonical approval, they put themselves outside the Church."
*CHURCH AUTHORITY. Those who are received into the ecclesiastical hierarchy are not chosen by the people, or by secular authority, but are placed in the degrees of power of orders by sacred ordination. In the supreme pontificate the person lawfully elected, and freely accepting the election, receives the power of jurisdiction by divine right. All others receive jurisdiction by canonical mission (Canon 109, 1917 Code of Canon Law).
(Image on left of high-ranking, 30th degree Freemason, "Cardinal" Achille Liénart)
FYI: Rama Coomaraswamy publicly changed his view, from his 1982 glaringly deficient article on the question of the validity of Lefebvre's "Orders" [which the Hierarchy views as doubtful -TCW] from, quote: "There is no credible evidence which shows that Cardinal
Liénart was a Freemason."
To the fact, that indeed "Cardinal" Leinart was a Freemason.
"It was Cardinal Leinart, another Freemason, who in 1950 petitioned Pius XII for permission to celebrate the Easter Vigil at night rather than
in the morning - and this for "pastoral reasons". 44 Frs. Antonelli and Bugnini were glad to assist. What resulted was a new rite ..." -Rama Coomaraswamy, "The Destruction
of the Christian Tradition," p. 246, 2006
"The Destruction of the Christian Tradition",
By Rama Coomaraswamy,
Chapter 12 The Liturgical Revolution, pp. 246-247
"In 1948 Pius XII established the 'Commission for Liturgical
Reform.' Its director was Rev. Ferinando Antonelli, O.F.M, (later Cardinal) and the Secretary the Rev. Annibale Bugnini, C.M. (later Archbishop). It is these two individuals who have primarily been responsible for the various steps that culminated in the 'Novus
We have already presented evidence that Archbishop Bugnini was a Freemason. 43 The Freemasons have long dreamed of infiltrating, and indeed, of taking
over the Church. It was Cardinal Leinart, another Freemason,
who in 1950 petitioned Pius XII for permission to celebrate the Easter Vigil at night rather than in the morning - and this for 'pastoral reasons'. 45 Frs. Antonelli and Bugnini were glad to assist. What resulted was a new rite with
1) optional prayers; 2) the use of the vernacular; and 3) the rubric directing the celebrant to "sit and listen" rather than read from the altar. Then in 1953 the immemorial midnight Eucharistic fast was reduced from midnight to three hours. ... The
next step occurred in 1955 when a new Holy Week rite was introduced. It contained the following key features: 1) everything was short and simple; 2) the priest faced the people during the essential parts of the rite; 3) the prayers
at he foot of the altar and the Last Gospel were suppressed; and 4) the laity recited the Our Father aloud with the priest. The Palm Sunday service was altered along similar lines. Six of the collects, the ancient rite for the Blessings of the Palms, and the Gloris
Laus et honor at the door were all suppressed. In addition the recitation of the Passion was shortened so as to omit the accounts of the anointing at Bethany and the Last Supper. Still more, the Triduum Sacrum or
the sevices of the last three days of Holy Week along with the beautiful Office ofTenebrae were virtually destroyed; the Mass of the Presanctified on Good Friday was abolished and replaced with a simple communion service, and contrary to immemorial
custom, a genuflection was prescribed at the prayer for the Jews. The Holy Saturday Vigil was dramatically changed, with its lessons reduced from twelve to four. There was also a drastic modification of the traditional rite for the Blessing
of the New Fire and the Paschal Candle. The following year the ancient Vigil Service for Pentecost Eve was entirely suppressed. The liturgical revolution was well on its way."
TCW's Reply to Question on SSPX Argument about French Mason Talleyrand
(Contains historical record
[writings] of Talleyrand regarding his sacramental intention)
1976 Italian Register of Secret Societies List of Freemasonic Infiltrators (Includes Liénart)
(The 1917 Code obliges Catholics to accept this
Italian government list as valid, as (Canon 1814), states that civil documents are to be presumed genuine unless the contrary is proven by evident arguments.)
Why Marcel Lefebvre Was Never A Priest Or Bishop
(Thomistic Principles Invalidate SSPX "Orders" From Lefebvre)
Marcel Lefebvre's Freemasonic Activity at SSPX HQ Econe
Visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich
Infiltrator Freemasonic Demolishers
"I saw St. Peter's. A great crowd of men was trying to pull it down... . Lines connected these men one with another and with others throughout the whole world. I was amazed at their perfect understanding. The
demolishers, mostly apostates and members of different sects, broke off whole pieces and worked according to rules and instructions. They wore white aprons bound with blue riband. In them were pockets and they had trowels stuck in their belts. The costumes of the others were *various. ... ."
*(Such as Satanic
Masons masquerading in vestments -TCW)
"I saw heart-rending misery ... I saw Jews standing around the
doorways (overseeing the assault). All this grieved me deeply. Then my Heavenly Spouse bound me as He Himself had been bound to the pillar, and
He said: 'So will the Church yet be bound. She will be tightly bound before she shall again rise.' "
"I see the Church alone, forsaken by all and around her strife, misery, hatred, treason,
resentment, total blindness. I see messengers sent on all sides from a dark central point with messages that issue from their mouths like black vapor, enkindling in the breast of
their hearers rage and hatred. I pray earnestly for the oppressed!--In those places in which some souls still pray I see light descending; but on others, pitchy darkness. The situation is terrible! May God have mercy! O city!, O city, (Rome) with what art
thou threatened! The storm approaches--be on thy guard!"
(Source, "The Life of Anne Catherine Emmerich",
By Very Reverend Carl E. Schmöger, C.SS.R, 1885)
"Probability" never suffices for the administration of the Sacraments.
Note: "It is a grave responsibility of all Catholics to prove to themselves that the sacraments where they are attending are licit
[lawful] in the eyes of Christ's Church, for if Catholics ever approach the sacraments without knowing for certain that the ministers have [BOTH] valid holy orders and have been given canonical approval [authorization to function], they put themselves outside
THE USE OF PROBABLE OPINIONS
CHAPTER VII, SECTION I: Probable Opinions of Validity
In conferring the Sacraments (as also in the Consecration in Mass) it is never allowed to adopt
a probable course of action as to validity and to abandon the safer course. The contrary was explicitly condemned by Pope Innocent XI. (See his condemnation below -TCW). To do so would be a grievous sin against religion, namely an act
of irreverence towards what Christ our Lord has instituted; it would be a grievous sin against charity, as the recipient would probably be deprived of the graces and effect of the Sacrament; it would be a grievous sin against justice, as the recipient
has a right to valid Sacraments, whenever the minister, whether ex officio or not, undertakes to confer a Sacrament. In the necessary Sacraments there is no doubt about the triple sin; in Sacraments
that are not necessary there will always be the grave sacrilege against religion.
Henry Davis, S.J.
Moral and Pastoral Theology
London: Sheed & Ward, 1935
Volume III, page 27
Various Errors on Moral Subjects (That are formally condemned by the Church):
[The following is] Condemned by a degree
of the Holy Office, March 4, 1679:
1. It is not illicit in conferring sacraments to follow a probable
opinion regarding the value of the sacrament, the safer opinion being abandoned, unless the law forbids it, convention or the danger of incurring grave harm. Therefore one should not make use of probable opinions only in conferring baptism, sacerdotal, or
episcopal orders. (Denzinger 1151)
Innocent XI (1676-1689)
Blessed be St. Peter, Prince of the Apostles!
The Papal Restoration
In Today's Catholic World (TCWBLOG.com) carries the approbation in
writing of the Holy See in exile. It faithfully adheres to the rules for Catholic Journals mandated by Leo XIII in the Apostolic Constitution Officiorum ac Munerum, January 25, 1897 - so heavily re-stressed by Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis, September 8, 1907