(Left) Handling real Sarin gas situation (On Right) April, 2017 "event" in Khan Sheikhounhese, Syria
experts say the person or other "evidence gatherers" like him (on the right), would all be dead if they had come into contact with real military-grade Sarin - without the proper protective gear - which indeed they lacked.
NOW MATTIS ADMITS THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE ASSAD USED POISON GAS ON HIS
BY IAN WILKIE
Lost in the hyper-politicized hullabaloo surrounding the Nunes Memorandum [...] was the striking statement by Secretary
of Defense James Mattis that the U.S. has “no evidence" that the Syrian government used the banned nerve agent Sarin against its own people.
This assertion flies in the face of the White House (NSC) Memorandum which was rapidly produced and declassified to justify an American Tomahawk missile strike against the Shayrat airbase
Mattis offered no temporal qualifications, which means that both the 2017 event in Khan Sheikhoun and the 2013 tragedy
in Ghouta are unsolved cases in the eyes of the Defense Department and Defense Intelligence Agency.
Mattis went on to acknowledge
that “aid groups and others” had provided evidence and reports but stopped short of naming President Assad as the culprit.
were casualties from organophosphate poisoning in both cases; that much is certain. But America has accused Assad of direct responsibility for Sarin attacks and even blamed Russia for culpability in the Khan Sheikhoun tragedy.
Now its own military boss has said on the record that we have no evidence to support this conclusion. In so doing, Mattis tacitly impugned the
interventionists who were responsible for pushing the “Assad is guilty” narrative twice without sufficient supporting evidence, at least in the eyes of the Pentagon.
This dissonance between the White House and the Department of Defense is especially troubling when viewed against the chorus of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) experts who have been questioning the (Obama
and Trump) White House narratives concerning chemical weapons in Syria since practically the moment these “Assad-ordered events” occurred.
(military industrial complex) launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles
at Syria on April, 2017, which killed approximately 17 human beings (Syrians).
Serious, experienced chemical weapons experts and investigators such as Hans Blix, Scott Ritter, Gareth Porter and Theodore Postol have all cast doubt on “official” American
narratives regarding President Assad employing Sarin.
These analysts have all focused on the technical aspects of the two attacks
and found them not to be consistent with the use of nation-state quality Sarin munitions.
The 2013 Ghouta event, for example,
employed home-made rockets of the type favored by insurgents. The White House Memorandum on Khan Sheikhoun seemed to rely heavily on testimony from the Syrian White Helmets who were filmed at the scene having contact with supposed Sarin-tainted casualties
and not suffering any ill effects.
Likewise, these same actors were filmed wearing chemical weapons training suits around
the supposed “point of impact” in Khan Sheikhoun, something which makes their testimony (and samples) highly suspect. A training suit offers no protection at all, and these people would all be dead if they had come into contact with real military-grade
Chemical weapons are abhorrent and illegal, and no one knows this more than Carla Del Ponte. She, however, was unable
to fulfill her U.N. Joint Investigative Mechanism mandate in Syria and withdrew in protest over the United States refusing to fully investigate allegations of chemical weapons use by "rebels" (jihadis) allied with the American effort to oust President Assad (including the use of Sarin by anti-Assad rebels).
fact that U.N. investigators were in Syria when the chemical weapon event in Khan Sheikhoun occurred in April 2017 makes it highly dubious that Assad would have given the order to use Sarin at that time. Common sense suggests that Assad would have chosen any
other time than that to use a banned weapon that he had agreed to destroy and never employ.
Furthermore, he would be placing
at risk his patronage from Russia if they turned on him as a war criminal and withdrew their support for him.
as a former soldier, it makes no sense to me that anyone would intentionally target civilians and children as the White Helmet reports suggest he did.
There is compelling analysis from Gareth Porter suggesting that phosphine could have been released by an airborne munition striking a chemical depot, since the clouds and casualties (while organophosphate-appearing in some respects) do
not appear to be similar to MilSpec Sarin, particularly the high-test Russian bomb-carried Sarin which independent groups like “bellingcat” insist was deployed.
Donald Trump's Sept
2013 Tweet directed to Pres. Obama - wisely telling him to not start a war in Syria. Trump's campaign promise of stopping the US's costly on all levels, "endless wars" / "regime change"
policies of the D.C. establishment, was a key factor in gaining him his historic upset victory in the 2016 election.
America’s credibility was damaged by Colin Powell at the United Nations in 2003 falsely accusing Saddam Hussein of having mobile anthrax laboratories. Fast forward to 2017 and we encounter Nikki
Haley in an uncomfortably similar situation at the U.N. Security Council calling for action against yet another non-Western head-of-state based on weak, unsubstantiated evidence.
Now Secretary Mattis has added fuel to the WMD propaganda doubters’ fire by retroactively calling into question the rationale for an American cruise missile strike.
While in no way detracting from the horror of what took place against innocent civilians in Syria, it is time for America to stop shooting
first and asking questions later.
Ian Wilkie is an international lawyer, U.S. Army veteran and former intelligence community
Innocent Lives Fighting the Jews Wars
CIA Files Prove U.S. Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran